Start with a single verified timeline
We map key procedural events, known facts, documents and the professionals responsible across jurisdictions. The timeline shows where evidence overlaps and where national procedures must stay separate.
Distinct workstreams
Is there a newly discovered fact that could satisfy Article 42?
Which documents can qualified local counsel properly obtain or challenge?
Are there urgent deadlines or protective applications needing immediate court representation?
Is a separate international channel available, admissible and proportionate?
Would outside engagement help document facts, or could disclosure create risk?
Deliverables
Every proceeding on one timeline.
Who holds what, and who may see it.
Each lawyer stays independent and accountable for their own jurisdiction.
Options, sequencing and the risks of each step.
Why coordination matters
Inconsistent narratives, unsupported statements and uncontrolled document sharing undermine confidence in a case. A coordinated plan aims for accuracy, confidentiality and realistic sequencing, not public pressure or procedural shortcuts.
FAQs
Can one team manage all jurisdictions?
Coordinating research is different from practising local law. Court representation and local advice require qualified professionals and valid instructions.
Is a CCF revision a substitute for an extradition appeal?
No. They are separate proceedings with different authorities, consequences and deadlines.
What if the review finds no basis for revision?
The strategy says so and identifies any separate lawful next steps, without manufacturing a CCF ground.
Independent summary. These institutions do not endorse this service. Check the live official guidance before filing.